My E-mail Stalker and Newton's Third Law
Over the last few months I have been receiving regular e-mails from an unknown girl inviting me to sign up to various websites with her or to be her Bebo Buddy or whatever the latest communal website fad happens to be. For the most part, considering that I don’t know her at all, I have ignored them but last night I became curious. Just who was this girl? And where did she get my e-mail address from and is she some sort of sordid e-mail stalker?
So, to put the conspiracy theories in my head to rest, I signed up to one of the websites and clicked on her profile. To my horror, this is what popped before my eyes: 
Oh, dear Lord…words fail me.
As I reviewed the eloquent synopsis above I couldn’t help but begin to pick out some deeply disturbing issues:
1. The dreaded photo. Well it’s a bad starting point really isn’t it. The cap…and those eyes! What happened? Did she loose her eye liner and thought a black marker would suffice? Was it a fight? A disease? Some things man is not meant to know.
2 Build: Muscular? There’s just no need for that.
3. The Personal Words form a poetic summary of the whole. I hope I never meet Trev.
4. Peter Andre? Peter Plastic Pecs himself is her favourite artist?
5. She loves to party on the corner of the street. I suspect that the full implications of that statement have not really sunk in for her. Plus, she’s 20, not 13.
6. She relaxes in the back seat of a Saxo, loves to holiday at Butlins and her favourite sport is ‘to bitch’.
The only thing that's missing is the cliched, Sex: yes please. Clearly, I could go on, and the effort not to be cruel is immense, although in my defence this post would not exist if she didn't persist in e-mailing me. However, far be it from me to act as the self-righteous character assassin here, especially as I don’t even know her. Long may that continue. Instead I would like to share with you my new theory. It goes like this:
In physics for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction right? I have now come to believe that for every person, there is an equal and opposite person. For example you have Christ and the Anti-Christ, Arnold Swarzenegger and Arnold Rimmer, Camilla Parker Bowles and Johnny Knoxville, etc etc. And that this girl…(I changed her name, more out of sympathy than for any legal reasons),…this girl is my Anti-Me. Yes, she is the Anti-Heaton (or possibly a character from Little Britain). Every word I can think of to describe myself finds it’s antithesis in this young lady (or “durty hoe”) from Walsall.
Sometimes I wonder what would happen if we ever met. Would the world come to a sudden end in a supernova fusion of matter and anti-matter. Cool. But then I think of her ‘relaxing’ on the backseat of Trevs red Saxo and pray fervently we never do meet. Or, for that matter, that she never finds this website. Hmm. Well, it’s all been in the best possible taste…I’m just not sure she’d understand.
Supposing that i was going to end on a sensible note, I guess i would say that it's strange, the extent to which someone elses life is so instantly an anathema to me. For me everything ends in reflection and introspection and this, I know, reflects something that I don't like. Genuinely, I wish her all the best in her ambitions...although maybe not the one about becoming a page 3 girl. But more than that i hope that she finds herself living in a community where people love her for who she is. That only leaves me asking myself; could that community involve me? Impossible? It shouldn't be.
"File them next to the toilet..."
Two posts in as many days! I'm on fire...except that this is mostly not my work. This is an article that was printed in the Guardian newspaper and touted as a genuine letter, sent by the Inland Revenue. Whether or not that is actually true is totally irrelevant because it tickles my sense of humour either way. Apologies if you've seen it before...Dear Mr Addison,
I am writing to you to express our thanks for your more than prompt reply to our latest communication, and also to answer some of the points you raise. I will address them, as ever, in order.
Firstly, I must take issue with your description of our last as a "begging letter". It might perhaps more properly be referred to as a "tax demand". This is how we, at the Inland Revenue have always, for reasons of accuracy; traditionally referred to such documents.
Secondly, your frustration at our adding to the "endless stream of crapulent whining and panhandling vomited daily through the letterbox on to the doormat" has been noted. However, whilst I have naturally not seen the other letters to which you refer I would cautiously suggest that their being from "pauper councils, Lombardy pirate banking houses and pissant gas-mongerers" might indicate that your decision to "file them next to the toilet in case of emergencies" is at best a little ill-advised. In common with my own organisation, it is unlikely that the senders of these letters do see you as a "lackwit bumpkin" or, come to that, a "sodding charity". More likely they see you as a citizen of Great Britain, with a responsibility to contribute to the upkeep of the nation as a whole.
Which brings me to my next point. Whilst there may be some spirit of truth in your assertion that the taxes you pay "go to shore up the canker-blighted, toppling folly that is the Public Services", a moment's rudimentary calculation ought to disabuse you of the notion that the government in any way expects you to "stump up for the whole damned party" yourself. The estimates you provide for the Chancellor's disbursement of the funds levied by taxation, whilst colourful, are, in fairness, a little off the mark. Less than you seem to imagine is spent on "junkets for Bunterish lickspittles" and "dancing whores" whilst far more than you have accounted for is allocated to, for example, "that box-ticking façade of a university system."
A couple of technical points arising from direct queries:
1.. The reason we don't simply write "Muggins" on the envelope has to do with the vagaries of the postal system;
2.. You can rest assured that "sucking the very marrows of those with nothing else to give" has never been considered as a practice because even if the Personal Allowance didn't render it irrelevant, the sheer medical logistics involved would make it financially unviable.
I trust this has helped. In the meantime, whilst I would not in any way
wish to influence your decision one way or the other, I ought to point out that even if you did choose to "give the whole foul jamboree up and go and live in India" you would still owe us the money.
Please forward it by Friday.
Yours Sincerely,
H J Lee
Customer RelationsComedy! A more serious post on the Hiroshima nuclear bomb later in the week...